Description
Ortenblad, Hong, and Snell (2016) [required reading] begged the question: in light of what is reported as good leadership or bad leadership, does leadership training, education, or development do any good? The authors also presented five approaches (Education and Development, Practice, Heritage, Role Expectations, and Appropriate Compensation) to what they called engendering better leadership as a way to open debate on the topic of leadership development. For this weeks discussion, choose one of the five approaches and present a critique of its potential to develop better leaders. Defend your positions with credible sources and specific examples. The link below provide information on the approaches. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13678… Requirements Include introduction and conclusion Discussion should be 4 paragraphs. Use Peer Reviewed Journal Articles APA format is required and each reference must be cited in the paper. Use headings to organize the content in your work. Please no plagiarism and sources should not be older than 5 years