Troy University Listening Effectively Fallacies of Listening Discussion

Question Description

I’m working on a communications exercise and need support to help me learn.

Please watch the movie The Caine Mutiny (1954),  directed by Edward Dmytryk. I would suggest reading the questions here  first and taking notes while watching the movie. You can find the  questions to guide you below, and you are required to answer all of them  in your essay. You are free to emphasize any other important point you  observe in the movie. You will write an essay with an introduction, main  body, and conclusion section and incorporate the questions into your  essay. Please do not forget to use the formal  language that is required in an essay.

The essay will be  double-spaced, written in font size 12, minimum three, maximum four  pages (excluding the bibliography page) in length. No cover letter is  needed.

You must answer all questions provided to you for the assignment.

If you use sources, please cite  them properly (Chicago or APA styles are accepted)  and have a  bibliography page at the end of your essay. Your submissions must be in  DOC or DOCX format.

You can access the movie through the link provided below:

https://digitalcampus.swankmp.net/sdsu301489/watch/3B79394C41D48FFA?referrer=direct (Links to an external site.)

Please answer the following questions:

Does the captain get carried away sometimes? How does he cover up  the mistake of cutting the towline by circling? Does he admit mistakes  or blame the others? Why does he not want his ship to be the last ship  arriving at Pearl Harbor after the exercise?
What happens when the USS Caine assists the landing craft ¬†to the beach? Does the captain’s behavior change under stress? Why does ¬†Lieutenant Steve Maryk, the executive officer, argue with the captain? ¬†How do the officers and crew interpret the captain’s behavior?
Does Captain Quegg try to gain the respect of his officers and make ¬†peace in the wardroom meeting? Why does he fail? Do the officers trust ¬†him? How does Lieutenant Keefer, the communications officer, explain the ¬†captain’s mental status?
Can people be led only by relying on position power, fear, and the threat of punishment?
Considering the Managerial Grid theory, how can you define Captain ¬†Queeg’s leadership? What is the impact of his leadership on the morale ¬†and motivation of the crew?
What happens on the night of the typhoon? Is the captain able to give orders
Rubric

Writing Assignment 

 Criteria Ratings        Pts         

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Comprehensive and accurate content review 

  

5 to >4.0 pts                                  Excellent

The documentary was presented thoroughly, accurately, and persuasive manner in the paper.

4 to >3.0 pts                                  Good

Either some material was not covered or was covered inaccurately or superficially.

3 to >2.0 pts                                  Fair

Either some material was not covered or was covered inaccurately or superficially.

2 to >0 pts                                  Needs Improvement

Some key points are either missing or glossed over unnecessarily.

5 pts
 

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical analysis and reflection on useful knowledge 

  

5 to >4.0 pts                                  Excellent

Thoughtful, critical analysis of the assigned documentary offered in the paper and details on key issues are provided.

4 to >3.0 pts                                  Good

Analysis advanced key ideas but did so sporadically or inconsistently; some details are missing from the analysis.

3 to >2.0 pts                                  Fair

The analysis included some key ideas but failed to reflect most of them, and either the details are not included or inaccurate

2 to >0 pts                                  Needs Improvement

The paper largely failed to grasp key issues and lacked any details or critical approach.

5 pts
 

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Mechanics 

  

5 to >4.0 pts                                  Excellent

Excellent writing of the paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; professional language use is evident.

4 to >3.0 pts                                  Good

Good writing of the paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; use of professional language is evident.

3 to >2.0 pts                                  Fair

Some  evidence of good writing of the paper; organization of paper; use of  concise, clear language; professional language use is intermittent.

2 to >0 pts                                  Needs Improvement

Little  if any evidence of good writing of the paper; organization of paper;  use of concise, clear language; lack of professional language.

5 pts
 

        Total Points:                            15                              

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *